By Dan Granger

No, it’s not China. It’s the same old battle where a media personality steps on a land mine and anyone running ad placements in their program(s) finds themselves under sudden attack. 

This week’s subject is none other than Laura Ingraham. After she displayed a graphic featuring eight people censored on public media—including Outspoken-actor James Woods, Conspiracy-peddling Alex Jones, and Space-wasting Racist Paul Nehlen—she didn’t help herself with the graphic reading, “prominent voices censored on social media.”

Ingraham, the former Supreme Court Clerk, and Reagan Speechwriter craftily responded to CNN via Twitter: “Retweeting screenshots of despicable old tweets by racists and/or anti-semites must make those racists & anti-semites very happy. Unfortunately, it does zero to elevate the debate in America. @CNN

The Washington Post was proud to announce that, “At Least One Advertiser is pulling out.

Left-leaning news outlets should take care, lest the right construct parallel machinery and turn conservatives loose on them. This would invite a trade war impacting both sides in a repugnant race to the bottom—hacking away at each other’s ad dollars—changing nothing and numbing consumers so that their trust in media continues to decline. And now I’ve thrown up in my mouth and it burns. 

To be clear, Laura Ingraham is one of the few national broadcasters I’ve never met. I don’t watch Laura Ingraham. I don’t listen to Laura Ingraham. And as far as I can tell, none of Oxford Road’s clients are buying any of her media specifically via podcast, radio or television. It’s not intentional. If we obtain data suggesting the ROI would be positive on any of her channels for any one of our clients, I would have no qualms about recommending her program. If we are helping you scale your business, we need to reach people across the political spectrum. Quick aside: Many times, the sponsors receiving blowback aren’t even buying these shows intentionally, but rather purchasing run-of-schedule campaigns that just happen to land within the program in question. 

More importantly, does Laura Ingraham have hatred in her heart—at least a little more so than anyone else on cable news? Probably not. But I really don’t know that either. What I don’t like is that we are playing a big game of “if, then” about something that in all likelihood was a screw up by some low-level production coordinator who didn’t properly vet the graphic before the daily news program went live. There’s a good chance it cost this individual their job. Long live 24-hour news cycles. 

The important thing to consider as an advertiser is that this is a frequent game of “gotcha” played by special interest groups and news channels all seeking to benefit themselves. Advertisers become a pawn in this game and get caught in the cross-fire. Too often they take the bait and are worse off because they end up getting attacked by both sides, now being seen as a Turncoat as well. 

If/when you find yourself in this position—regardless of emails, tweets, etc. you receive with an accusatory tone suggesting you believe in something which you do not simply because of where your ad impressions might have fallen—the best thing you can do is say…nothing. If the heat persists after a week you can suspend placement in that show for a time, but don’t make any public announcements. It probably won’t outlast a full news cycle. If you go that route and suspend the show from rotation, it’s best to set a time limit on how long you avoid the program lest you find yourself unwelcome to re-enter. Based on the trend over the last 12 months, you will soon find yourself back on the conservative channel, but forced into buying only their lowest-rated shows at a premium. You will have given yourself an inability to purchase run-of-schedule media buys, as show-specific placements cost more than rotators. Yet as any performance marketer of scale knows, you’re going to want to reach conservative audiences. 

Pro-tip: If you get negative feedback from someone that you can validate as a customer, take this seriously. You could even have a prepared response for them showing that their viewpoint does matter. But that doesn’t mean you should only advertise on the complaining party’s favorite networks. You should hear them out and be ready to listen to their concerns, but don’t let them dictate your media schedule. 

The underlying issue here is that our nation is bitterly divided, and digging in on one side or another does not elevate your brand nor does it add value to our national discourse. But what if you are like the people complaining and really really don’t like the show you were buying anyway? Well, then you definitely need to be there! Death to echo-chambers and death to limiting your revenue streams. If you really want to influence the public with your values, isolation will not help you. Let your values shine through your products and use that to build relationships on both sides of the aisle. We will do much better as marketers and as a nation when we can say, “I disagree with what you say, but I will sponsor your right to say it.”

Categories

array(1) { [0]=> object(WP_Term)#2446 (16) { ["term_id"]=> int(8) ["name"]=> string(4) "Post" ["slug"]=> string(4) "post" ["term_group"]=> int(0) ["term_taxonomy_id"]=> int(8) ["taxonomy"]=> string(8) "category" ["description"]=> string(0) "" ["parent"]=> int(0) ["count"]=> int(154) ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" ["cat_ID"]=> int(8) ["category_count"]=> int(154) ["category_description"]=> string(0) "" ["cat_name"]=> string(4) "Post" ["category_nicename"]=> string(4) "post" ["category_parent"]=> int(0) } } Post

You May Also Like

ORBIT: The Oxford Road Benchmark Intelligence Tool

Joe Rogan Didn’t Make the Top 15. Critical Role Did. Here’s What $1.6 Billion in Performance Data Actually Reveals.

The first podcast rankings based on ROI, not downloads. Built on real campaign results from hundreds of advertisers.

 

After more than a decade of development, Oxford Road is unveiling ORBIT: a first-of-its-kind Benchmark Intelligence Tool built on real campaign outcomes from across the industry.

ORBIT aggregates over $1.6 billion in verified podcast spend, across hundreds of advertisers and 120+ genres, then normalizes it into one question: What actually worked?

It doesn’t tell you which podcasts are popular. It tells you which ones drive ROI. Which ones convert. Which ones are worth the check you’re about to write.

The First ORBIT Rankings

Below are the Top 15 Performing Podcasts, ranked by advertiser results over the past 12 months.
These are the shows that consistently outperformed benchmarks and delivered measurable ROI.

What ORBIT Reveals

  • Big reach ≠ big results: Joe Rogan and most tier-1 mega-shows didn’t crack the Top 15. Only 3 of the top performers (20%) are household-name podcasts. Advertisers systematically overpay for reach while ignoring shows that deliver better returns.

  • Comedy and politics dominate. 11 of the top 15 performers are comedy or news/politics shows—the exact categories many advertisers deliberately avoid due to brand safety concerns. Controversial content, when aligned with brand values, drives action.

  • Stop buying your own industry. We tested it: Tech companies don’t perform better on tech podcasts. Finance brands don’t win on business shows. There’s no statistically significant lift from matching your industry to your genre. Your customers listen to the same shows everyone else does: comedy, true crime, politics. The genre silo is costing you discoveries.

  • Faith-based shows overperform. Religious podcasts, particularly Christianity-focused content, rank in the top 6 genres for consistent ROI across multiple verticals—a finding impossible to surface without normalized, goal-based data

 

How Orbit Works (And Why It’s Different)

ORBIT normalizes performance across different advertiser goals—whether that’s target CAC, desired ROAS, or cost per qualified lead. This allows direct comparison across campaign types, something download-based rankings can’t provide.

The difference:
Many tracking tools tell you who’s advertising and estimate spend, count ad occurrences, or measure downloads and reach

ORBIT shows which podcasts made money and which ones didn’t
We factor in what advertisers paid, what they were trying to achieve, how it was measured, including survey-based attribution data, and whether the investment delivered ROI. That’s the difference between counting impressions and measuring profit.

Our methodology:

  • Minimum 3 distinct advertisers per show
  • Minimum 3 paid drops per advertiser
  • At least 50% of placements must exceed advertiser goals
  • 12-month rolling analysis updated monthly
  • Attribution-normalized across pixels, codes, URLs, and modeling

 

For Chief Audio Officers

ORBIT eliminates guesswork from podcast planning:

  • De-risk initial buys by seeing which shows have proven track records with similar advertisers
  • Optimize faster with normalized performance data across attribution models
  • Find hidden gems before they become expensive tier-1 shows
  • Break category assumptions with data that shows where your customers actually listen
  • Scale with confidence, knowing which placements consistently deliver ROI

The era of buying podcast ads based on download numbers is over. ORBIT shows you which shows drive performance, before you spend a dollar.

“This is what happened when real companies spent real money. If you want to know which podcasts work, start here.”
— Dan Granger, CEO, Oxford Road

 

Subscribe to The Influencer for monthly ORBIT updates

Podcast Loses A Friend

On Sunday night, Podcast lost a Founding Father.

Norm Pattiz, the architect of modern Network Radio who launched Westwood One in 1976 and pivoted to create Podcast One in 2013, passed away at 79. 

Like most Founding Fathers, Pattiz’s career was marked by the complexity of great deeds while daring greatly, enjoying the spoils, and of stories of a high-flying media mogul from a bygone era colliding with the values and expectations of our modern world. 

Tributes this week describe Norm as a “Pioneer,” “Innovator,” “Charismatic,” “Imaginative,” “Showman,” “Unstoppable,” “Always trying new things,” “Could see around corners,” “Crazy about his wife, Mary,” “Revolutionary.” 

Beyond his defining contributions to the radio and later podcast industries, Norm was chairman of the board of Lawrence Livermore and on the board of the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. He was appointed by President Clinton to the United States Broadcasting Board of Governors and reappointed by President Bush in 2002. In 2009 he was inducted into the National Radio Hall of Fame. 

Norm was a staple at Laker Games, always sitting Courtside across from Nicholson wearing something audacious, often attracting nearly as much attention as the players. 

At the time of publication, the author remembers Norm Pattiz as a friend. 

But it didn’t start that way. 

It was 2012, and after six years of poking at the budding universe of on-demand audio, I was looking for a way in. I served as a foot soldier in Clear Channel’s army (now iHeartMedia), selling and managing local radio campaigns. I knew the field was ripe for disruption and believed to my core that Podcast would be the answer, and I couldn’t find a way to make a living at it. 

Then I met Adam Carolla. He was doing a hit on a local radio broadcast to plug his new podcast venture in a studio a stone’s throw away from my desk. He was the first household name to leave traditional media behind and go all in on the new platform. And he was right down the hall at Clear Channel. So I waited until he finished and pitched to get permission to sell sponsors into his show as he walked to his car.

We ran a few tests, and the ads worked like magic for our clients. 

Along with my trusted associates Gary Brown and Miranda Romano (still key leaders at Oxford Road), we began a cold outreach campaign to any podcasters with enough published reviews on apple to suggest a marketable audience. Then I saw the headline that former radio colleague Kit Gray had teamed up with Radio Industry Titan, Norm Pattiz, to launch a new venture organizing an independent network to turn this fledgling forum for audio hobbyists into an entire industry. 

When Norm Pattiz entered the podcast arena, it was a shot across the bow. He locked up Adam Carolla in a representation contract as the cornerstone of his new network. Despite our efforts, there was no getting around Norm Pattiz and PodcastOne.

I had heard stories about Norm, the radio legend, and I instantly believed they were all true the moment we met. He was intimidating. Like the legends of old Hollywood powerbrokers who might say, “You’ll never work in this town again” if you crossed them. His assistant would call you and say she had Norm Pattiz on the line. But when we spoke about the business, he was focused, measured, and saw imaginative paths to a win-win. 

I accepted the new reality without any alternative options, and we started conducting business in good faith. 

Norm always delivered. He and his team worked with us to ensure client objectives were met while adding a pinch of old-fashioned Hollywood razzle-dazzle. The guy had first-class taste and the resources to create experiences that caused bonds to form between Network, Talent, Agency, and Client. The consummate showman, he taught me how we could do serious business and still have some fun. He had a bit of PT Barnum in him and modeled ways to stand out in an industry I’m still trying to digest. He was also funny and enough of a rascal that age wasn’t a burier to the relationship. 

Norm was not for everybody, but he was definitely for me. He has his fingerprints on the success of our agency and supported us as we rose from a struggling startup to the leading independently owned audio agency in the world. Over time, I got to know Norm better. I respected what he was able to achieve in our industry and found him very accessible in giving me advice on what it meant to run a business. 

He made his way into my heart most deeply as a true friend to Oxford Road and me in a time of need. After a few years of meteoric growth at Oxford Road, we entered a season of growing pains that introduced new challenges I had never experienced. Norm ended up on my business 911 list and graciously guided me out of some jams, for which I’ll be eternally grateful. 

Norm Pattiz believed in me. He would invite me to guest on shows and panels. When the pandemic hit, I started a new podcast for marketers to help guide them through uncharted waters. Lke many partners, Norm came on the show as an early guest when we didn’t have the audience to justify his time. Not only did he come on, he also contacted me after and invited us to join his network, knowing full well our niche focus would never be a real money maker. That’s why today Media Roundtable is part of the PodcastOne network. 

Norm was a visionary. Like Cornelius Vanderbilt moving from shipping to rail at 70, he left the industry where he had made his fortune because could see change was in the air. Podcast would disrupt Radio and become the digital beachhead to revitalize the industry, and he saw that years before his radio peers.

Pioneers are generally complex people, and Norm Pattiz was no exception. But if you want a revolution, you need to accept complex people as friends. Hopefully, they’ll accept your complexities too. 

If you work in the podcast industry or even listen to podcasts, you should know that Norm Pattiz was the first true Captain of Industry to step onto the field. In his final act, he rolled up his sleeves and poured the concrete for the roads we’re now walking on.  

Norm positively impacted millions of people, and I will raise my hand and say he made my life better through his generosity, wisdom, and friendship. 

Farewell, my friend. May your voice forever echo.

Dan

Oxford Road's Path to Brand Safety & Suitability

By Dan Granger

One of your first jobs as a marketer is to follow the marketer’s version of the Hippocratic oath–to do no harm to your brand. But your other job is to grow, and these directives can easily come into conflict. Advertising on politically-oriented shows or leveraging hosts with strong followings can be a way to capture attention in a crowded space. But that also exposes your brand to the controversies that the hosts and their guests can create.

You don’t have to look far back to have an example of how these controversies go for advertisers. Here’s what you’re likely to expect.

First, the host or guest says something controversial that a specific group wants to call out.

Next, you would receive an email—from a seemingly credible media outlet, blog, or group—seeking comment about your intention to continue your existing relationship with the program. Oftentimes, there’s a deadline for you to make a comment before your brand name is released on a list. That list will be used by a constituency who will contact you and others at your company—accusing you of supporting the beliefs of the offending party. 

Usually, the host’s words are taken somewhat out of context, but it doesn’t matter because the optics are bad and you wish they had made their point differently. You are tempted to respond to the email. However, real customers are rarely involved. Usually you will start to receive pressure from within your company. Questions start flying at you about why you would ever consider affiliating your brand with programs that so clearly do not represent the values your company represents. All the pressure to hit growth and CAC goals are out the window and now you must respond—or so it seems. All of this has happened in a matter of hours. It is at this precise moment that you must ignore your impulses to act and take a moment to pause amidst the immense amount of pressure and judgment surrounding you. 

Instead of following your emotions…Here’s what you need to do:

  1. Address Internal Stakeholders 
  2. Say Nothing Publicly
  3. Immediately “Pause” Your Media Investment 
  4. Gather Facts and Think Deeply
  5. Lay Out All Your Options
  6. DECIDE

One final note. Last year we began working with a company called Barometer to build a tool in order to proactively get ahead of this type of scenario. Powered by AI, Barometer is able to apply a Brand Safety & Suitability score by rating each episode and show using the GARM framework in order to determine the risk level of content. By looking through a host or shows track record you, as a brand marketer, are able to determine if the content they put out is consistent with your brand values and if it’s something you can feel confident sponsoring based on their track record.

As a brand marketer you don’t have hundred of hours in the day to listen to new shows you’re looking to test or to track episodes released by the hosts you’re currently choosing to sponsor. Barometer does this for you, all you have to do is sign up for an account and assign risk levels (no, low, medium, high) you are comfortable with across the 12 Risk adjacent elements GARM warns against. In a matter of second you have full transparency into the content of the show, can see potential issues flagged, and are able to make a data-backed decision as to whether or not you feel confident investing your brand dollars in a show.

Go forth and spend your influence wisely. 

Contact Oxford Road Today

george costanza