Richard Laermer is the bigmouth CEO of RLM PR which represents illustrious clients including Oxford Road.
In the 300 years during which I’ve worked in a service business, I find that the people who hire me are not looking to be right. They’re looking for me to tell them what is right.
The very concept that somehow they know—because inherently they’ve done this in a previous life—how to do PR seems a little off. I have watched a few dozen PR firms that look, smell and taste just like mine simply “yes” their clients to death, only to find out later that nothing was really done on their client’s behalf.
It’s what I call the “make it easy on yourself” theory: If you just nod and go with the flow, no one will argue with you. Yeah, that’s not the secret to life.
See, if you’re actually doing something for your clients, you have to break a few eggs. You need to explain precisely what you are doing and show the client that what you’re doing will net results.
I have always felt that talking a client into something that is right for them is simple. You explain what they get for participating in your grand scheme—then explain what they don’t get for not taking part. It’s pretty logical.
People coming to me to tell me how to do PR is so nonsensical it makes my head hurt. When the perennial question comes into play—“What is the story that we should be telling”—I’m glad they asked. We’ve worked in around 40 industries as a generalist firm, and we know which stories work and which don’t. It’s cliché to say—but what “plays” is second nature to us. In the dot-com days, we learned the hard way that a release stating Our CEO Sneezed will get laughed right out of the room. The idea that you think something your leader did is media-worthy is—well, funny. A story has to have an awesome angle or possess something tied to the news in order to procure coverage. Just to put something out because you feel like it is short-sighted. All it does is make the recipient or reader roll their eyes.
You can trace that notion of everything being press-worthy back to the demise of the once-decent internet provider “Aol.” (yes, Aol, not AOL—their branding). See, I watched for years as they released something they called news every single day—whereby reporters saw this as “the boy who cried wolf” scenario and trashed every single one. When America Online did something of value—I think it was version 12.0 that really had a path to greatness—the media didn’t even look up. That release (which I read with interest because a monolith had done something right), ended up in circular filing cabinets worldwide.
This is called Machine PR. It’s thinking you can churn out a constant stream of not-very-interesting news and somehow, if you do it enough, one thing will end up in the news. Which is not how any of this works. PR is a relationship-based business, which means we can’t RUIN those relationships by shoving shit down the throats of those influential journalists.
Customers who leave the work to the people they hire usually win. Naturally, I want to say “always,” but then I know that media-savvy clients are the cool exception. It’s because of what they did in a prior life or majored in once or because this is something that fascinates them. I adore the clients who are “media junkies” because they’re the ones who respond right away to an idea from our team—and come up with ones derived from a plethora of reading. Those are some melodious tunes to my ears.
The bottom line: The customer is only right when the customer knows what the heck she is talking about from experience or research/knowledge. It’s true—leave the expertise to the experts. Admit when you’re wrong or lack expertise. It’s healthy. And, it pays off. Always. Just ask that CEO who sneezed and did not bother telling anybody.